Fraxinus parryi, known by common names chaparral ash, crucecilla, and fresnillo, is a species of ash native to southwestern North America, growing as a shrub or a small tree.
Initially, the ash species native to northwestern B.C. was described as Fraxinus dipetala var. trifoliolata, by John Torrey. Torrey himself was uncertain if this represented a distinct species or an extreme form of F. dipetala, as he was working off of a specimen collected in 1850 by Charles C. Parry.Torrey, J., & Engelmann, G. (1859). Botany of the boundary. Cornelius Wendel.
George B. Sudworth (1908) and Paul C. Standley (1924) both listed the shrub as F. dipetala trifoliolata,Sudworth, G. B. (1908). Forest trees of the Pacific slope. US Government Printing Office.Standley, P. C. (1924). Trees and Shrubs of Mexico: Passifloraceae-Scrophulariaceae (Vol. 23). US Government Printing Office. whilst Elbert L. Little (1953) considered it variety trifoliolata,LITTLE, E. (1953). Checklist of native and naturalized trees of the United States. US Forest Service, US Dep. Agr. Handbook, (41). and E. Murray (1985) made it subspecies trifoliolata.Murray, E. 1985. Notae Sperrnatophytae No 5. Kalmia 15: 11. Gertrude N. Miller (1955) and Little (1979) later called it a synonym of F. dipetala.Little, E. L. (1979). Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized) (No. 541). DC: Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture.Miller, G. N. (1955). The genus Fraxinus, the ashes, in North America, north of Mexico. Edward A. Goldman (1916) misidentified it as Fraxinus attenuata.Goldman, E. A. (1916). Plant records of an expedition to Lower California (Vol. 16, No. 14). US Government Printing Office.
Harlan Lewis and Carl Epling noted the significant morphological differences between F. dipetala and this plant, with Ira L. Wiggins (1964 and 1980) also treating this ash as its own species. However, Lewis and Epling, along with those who regarded this ash as a new species, like Wiggins, described it as F. trifoliata, a misspelling of trifoliolata.Lewis, H., & Epling, C. (1940). Three species pairs from southern and lower California. American Midland Naturalist, 743-749.Shreve, F., & Wiggins, I. L. (1964). Vegetation and flora of the Sonoran Desert (Vol. 591). Stanford University Press. This, in turn, would make it F. trifoliolata, which is a homonym of an already existing species of Chinese ash, F. trifoliolata W. W. Smith (1916), native to Sichuan and Yunnan provinces in China.Smith, W. W. In: Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 9: 106. (1916)
In response to the confusion over the taxonomic classification of the ash, Moran described it as Fraxinus parryi, in honor of the collector C. C. Parry.
The classification of Fraxinus by Eva Wallander in 2008 regards this species as a synonym of F. dipetala, the California ash.Wallander, E. (2008). Systematics of Fraxinus (Oleaceae) and evolution of dioecy. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 273(1), 25-49. However, the Jepson treatment and regional sources like the San Diego Natural History Museum consider F. parryi to have enough qualifying morphological characteristics to be a separate species, noting that more molecular work will be needed to differentiate the two.
== Gallery ==
|
|